Shared library packaging issues

[GreatEmerald via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 17 November 2014 at 19:36:10 UTC, GreatEmerald wrote:
> Though I'm still a bit unsure about the whole druntime part. 
> The official RPM doesn't include any libraries for druntime, 
> only includes, albeit building it from source does produce a 
> druntime library. Is it worth separating it out into its own 
> package? Or should it be part of dmd-devel instead? 
> (druntime-devel doesn't really sound right if there is no 
> actual druntime package itself...)

Answering my own question, looks like libphobos2 statically links 
to druntime, so those includes should probably be part of 
libphobos2-devel.