Comparing Parallelization in HPC with D, Chapel, and Go
Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Nov 21 14:16:02 PST 2014
Am Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:29:09 +0000
schrieb "anon" <anonymous at gmail.com>:
>
> https://www.academia.edu/3982638/A_Study_of_Successive_Over-relaxation_SOR_Method_Parallelization_Over_Modern_HPC_Languages
Did they upload the source code and input data somewhere?
It looks like Chapel and D scale badly with number of threads
while Go makes excellent use of CPU cores and while executing
slower beats the other two @ >= 8 threads.
Then again they could have had much higher speed if they used
a GPU driven approach.
--
Marco
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list