std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 29 November 2014 at 14:15:12 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Friday, 14 November 2014 at 21:49:09 UTC, David Nadlinger 
> wrote:
>> On Friday, 14 November 2014 at 21:46:00 UTC, Robert burner 
>> Schadek wrote:
>>> You can always roll your own non locking Logger, but the 
>>> default should be thread-safe.
>>
>> You can't, since you need to inherit from Logger, which 
>> already does the locking for you in a way that's not 
>> overridable. Also, I take it you are familiar with the fact 
>> that locks aren't the only technique for achieving 
>> cross-thread synchronization.
>>
>
> Have you guys resolved this? If we cannot implement a 
> non-locking logger than that's a blocking issue for the library.

Yes, there is a lock free, thread local indirection now. That can 
be used to build a lock free, thread local logger.

p.s. You should have taken the phun