RFC: reference counted Throwable

[bearophile via Digitalmars-d]

ixid:

> The fundamentalness of the changes seem to be sufficient that 
> one could argue it's D3.

This seems a good idea.


> If you're going to make major changes wouldn't it be worth a 
> fuller break to address some of the other unresolved and 
> seemingly pretty major issues such as const/immutable and ref?

This seems a bad idea, because GC and scope tracking is a 
sufficiently large design & implementation space. You can't face 
all the large problems at the same time.

Bye,
bearophile