RFC: reference counted Throwable

[Piotrek via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 22 September 2014 at 09:13:49 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> ixid:
>
>> The fundamentalness of the changes seem to be sufficient that 
>> one could argue it's D3.
>
> This seems a good idea.
>

No, it's not a good idea. Tweaking memory management shouldn't 
require the language branching. IMHO, this would be a suicide.

Piotrek