Git, the D package manager
Mathias LANG via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Feb 5 07:22:25 PST 2015
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 15:15:10 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
>> The approach taken for DUB is to put as much knowledge of the
>> target problem into the build tool as possible, so that the
>> amount of work/knowledge required by the developer is minimal
>> (as long as problem is within the target domain). Make's
>> approach is the opposite and requires the developer to spell
>> out every detail of the build process for each project. Both
>> approaches have their advantages and DUB provides the command
>> functionality specifically to enable bridging this gap.
>
> The approach is a good one. There's just a lack of flexibility.
> I know it's a lot of work, I'm definitely willing to making it
> happen.
>
> Atila
I really hope more people will get on board with with the
development of dub, instead of everyone rolling it's own solution.
The contributor graph, while non-informative in most project,
shows a tendency:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dub/graphs/contributors
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list