Git, the D package manager

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 2/5/15 7:15 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
>> The approach taken for DUB is to put as much knowledge of the target
>> problem into the build tool as possible, so that the amount of
>> work/knowledge required by the developer is minimal (as long as
>> problem is within the target domain). Make's approach is the opposite
>> and requires the developer to spell out every detail of the build
>> process for each project. Both approaches have their advantages and
>> DUB provides the command functionality specifically to enable bridging
>> this gap.
>
> The approach is a good one. There's just a lack of flexibility. I know
> it's a lot of work, I'm definitely willing to making it happen.

That's fantastic. -- Andrei