stc.experimental.ndslice -> sci.ndslice

[Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 08:49:53 UTC, Seb wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 07:35:19 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>> On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 07:30:38 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
>>> I don't understand, what's wrong with std.sci or etc.sci?
>>
>> I am ok with std.sci for example. I just want to exclude 
>> dances with transaction between stable <->`experimental`. So, 
>> if all `std.sci` would be marked as experimental during few 
>> years this would what i want.
>>
> Another idea would be to go with std.experimental.sci.*, if 
> that has a higher consensus.

Just with std.sci.* without `experimental`. Otherwise this would 
be the same problem.