stc.experimental.ndslice -> sci.ndslice

QAston via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Apr 17 02:32:25 PDT 2016


On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 09:09:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
>
> Just with std.sci.* without `experimental`. Otherwise this 
> would be the same problem.

What's wrong with std.experimental.sci.*? experimental is where 
experimental modules/packages should go.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list