So, to print or not to print?

[TheGag96 via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 14:33:42 UTC, tn wrote:
> Maybe the name of the function should then be "writes" and/or 
> "writesln" (instead of "print"), so that it can at least be 
> found from the same place in the documentation as other related 
> functions. The naming scheme would then also be consistent with 
> the rest of the write/writef-family. (Here -s stands for 
> "separated/spaced" just as -f stands for "formatted" etc.)

I really like this idea. Much better than just "print", and maybe 
even better than "dump".