So, to print or not to print?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 04/26/2016 02:29 PM, TheGag96 wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 14:33:42 UTC, tn wrote:
>> Maybe the name of the function should then be "writes" and/or
>> "writesln" (instead of "print"), so that it can at least be found from
>> the same place in the documentation as other related functions. The
>> naming scheme would then also be consistent with the rest of the
>> write/writef-family. (Here -s stands for "separated/spaced" just as -f
>> stands for "formatted" etc.)
>
> I really like this idea. Much better than just "print", and maybe even
> better than "dump".

Can't it be confused with a verb? -- Andrei