The Computer Language Benchmarks Game

[LaTeigne via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 06:27:34 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 August 2016 at 03:21:37 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
>> My impression of Go is that it has good production quality.
>
> go is... not a very good language.

It probably seems a bit savorless but to the extent that it was 
designed "as a better C" there's no scam.

Also it was very quickly bottstrapped. I wonder if bootstrapping 
was not a priority over the features set.