C++17

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 15:51:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 10:39:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
> Grøstad wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 09:33:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> No that would be stupid to make that the default as it is 
>>> unsafe.
>>
>> When would you estimate that D could have a production ready 
>> default memory managment solution (without GC)?
>>
>
> Now, D can do the exact same as C++ .

Not really, but that was not the question. So let me repeat:

When would you estimate that D will have a production ready 
default memory management solution (without GC).