C++17

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 15:59:37 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 15:51:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 10:39:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
>> Grøstad wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 09:33:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>>> No that would be stupid to make that the default as it is 
>>>> unsafe.
>>>
>>> When would you estimate that D could have a production ready 
>>> default memory managment solution (without GC)?
>>>
>>
>> Now, D can do the exact same as C++ .
>
> Not really, but that was not the question. So let me repeat:
>
> When would you estimate that D will have a production ready 
> default memory management solution (without GC).

I don't think it is desirable. I do think we should focus on 
having GC.malloc/GC.free have the same level of perfs than 
malloc/free, which is very doable.

Now as to when, well, I'm waiting for your PR.