C++17
Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Jan 26 11:02:54 PST 2016
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 18:57:45 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> I don't think it is desirable. I do think we should focus on
> having GC.malloc/GC.free have the same level of perfs than
> malloc/free, which is very doable.
Does this mean that you have given up on D getting an ownership
mechanism?
> Now as to when, well, I'm waiting for your PR.
Not sure what you mean?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list