Anybody still using the chm docs

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 10:58:04 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> It's a huge maintenance effort for us to produce the chm files.

I didn't know this was a thing. It's cool, but if it is a big 
inconvenience, then I don't think it needs to be included. I 
suggest just providing a way for people to make it themselves or 
download it (and clearly document how to do it).