Anybody still using the chm docs

[FrankLike via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 at 11:54:31 UTC, captaindet wrote:
>> It's a huge maintenance effort for us to produce the chm files.
>>...
>> So I'm wondering if in 2016 someone really needs an offline 
>> copy of a
>> website shipped with a binary release?
>
> i am very glad the chm file exists whenever i am not online, 
> e.g. on a plane or train (free wifi is not a given everywhere). 
> finding something in the local html is quite awkward w/o 
> google...
>
> if it really takes up too much time i will understand if it has 
> to go too, especially if i a am the minority. just saying: i do 
> use it occasionally, and whenever i do it is a big help.
>
> /det

+1