std.experimental.checkedint is ready for comments!
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Jun 16 05:29:27 PDT 2016
On 6/16/16 2:55 AM, lobo wrote:
> Without a DIP you have to expect the design could be turned down by any
> core developer when they first get the opportunity to review it, no
> matter how long after the work was initiated.
We're still working on making DIPs a process that requires leadership to
intervene, but I'd say this is already true now.
Per the title of this thread: "std.experimental.checkedint is ready for
comments!". What kind of comments were expected?
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list