Tuple enhancement
Kapps via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Oct 16 18:03:54 PDT 2016
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 18:51:06 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe
wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 13:58:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>> I was thinking it would be handy if tuples had a way to access
>> a field by name at runtime. E.g.:
>>
>> Tuple!(int, "a", double, "b") t;
>> string x = condition ? "a" : "b";
>> double v = t.get!string(x, 3.14);
>
> That would mean that tuple then needs to keep the strings
> around - taking up space. That plus the fact that the following
> code is equivalent (obviously):
>
> Tuple!(int, "a", double, "b") t;
> double v = condition ? t.a : t.b;
>
> Why this addition? What does it enable?
I don't think this would actually require storing any additional
data. It'd be more like:
struct Tuple(Aliases...) {
auto get(T)(string name) {
foreach(alias, i; ExtractNames!Aliases) {
if(alias == name)
return this[i];
}
}
}
Which is the advantage over runtime reflection in this case. It
does seem a bit arbitrary to have Tuple include it though. But
given that it's a template method (therefore won't be compiled in
if not accessed for this particular Tuple type) and requires
storing no data in the instance, there's zero overhead if you're
not actually using the feature.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list