Tuple enhancement
Sebastiaan Koppe via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Oct 17 00:51:56 PDT 2016
On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 20:11:01 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 18:51:06 +0000, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
>> That would mean that tuple then needs to keep the strings
>> around - taking up space.
>
> It doesn't change Tuple.sizeof.
Sure, but it still takes up space in the executable. Negligible
of course, but for something that doesn't bring anything to the
table, not so.
> It's a little bit of runtime reflection, which people sometimes
> find handy. There's nothing stopping you from writing it
> manually or with metaprogramming, granted. And if it's just
> tuples, it doesn't seem like much of an advantage.
Exactly. When you want runtime reflection, would you put it in a
tuple?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list