"for" statement issue

[Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 13:42:49 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 13:33:26 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> It does create a lambda?
>> Hmm that should not happen.
>
> I think deprecating `{ lambda }` is really the way to go. It'd 
> fix this as well at that other FAQ at pretty low cost.

Yes lets make it happen!
{ } has too many meanings.
Lets deprecate this one.