"for" statement issue

[Temtaime via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 13:42:49 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Friday, 21 October 2016 at 13:33:26 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Eh, that's exactly what the language rules say should happen, 
> and it actually does make sense to me... you might even want to 
> use an immediately-called lambda to group several statements 
> together into one expression.
>
> [...]

Please, no.
It's fully clear that { stmts } createa a lambda, just () is 
ommited.

foo({ code; }); is always OK and we shouldn't deprecate it.