Exceptions in @nogc code

[irritate via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 9 April 2017 at 07:56:08 UTC, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> On 09/04/17 00:35, Christophe wrote:
>
>> My dog ate my homework.
>>
>> deadalnix's a genius of marketing. He has no product, all he 
>> invested
>> was a couple afternoons in newsgroup posts edging on rants. 
>> It's
>> impossible to convert the incomplete ideas that he throws over 
>> the fence
>> into spec and code. But he sells them as the perfect product. 
>> That the
>> posts are incomplete and unclear helps because whatever 
>> problem has a
>> solution in the future. What amazes me is he still grabs the 
>> attention
>> of newbies in the forum.
>
> It seems to me you are posting this after the homework have 
> already been found. To me, said homework even seem to have 
> merit, though I acknowledge you might disagree.

His "detailed proposal" in the mailing list is not yet recovered. 
  Perhaps Symantec owns the license.

> Personally, I think keeping things about the proposals rather 
> than about the person would be more beneficial to the language 
> at large.

The problems is with the so called "proposals".  Second class 
ideas nowhere near implementation. There is a better discussion 
in this forum, every other week.  Deadalinx should get a better 
image of the quality of his own work and stop shamelessly touting 
it.

irritate