Anybody still using the chm docs

[Manu]

On 16 June 2016 at 06:22, Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> I still use CHM document as it is absolutely the best solution compared to
>> anything else. I think it is a mistake to compare CHM with PDF... They are
>> made for different things...
>>
>
> I forgot to mention - I use CHM on Linux. It is not my fault that
> opensource community could not come up with a better or/and standardised
> solution... The only standard solution for this that Linux has are man
> pages - clearly not suitable this purpose! Other, better solutions are
> there, but are not adopted by all - Gnome has one format, KDE another,
> etc... CHAOS. Therefore, I decided to use CHM.
>

I approve of this message!
At my old work, we released CHM docs specifically for linux users too. They
preferred the CHM index and searchability compared to PDF or something like
that.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20180217/1513d1c1/attachment.html>