Anybody still using the chm docs

[Danni Coy]

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 17 February 2018 at 16:52, Danni Coy <danni.coy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is the reason for favouring chm as a format that it fits in with the
>> visual studio ecosystem better?
>> Having used both pdf and chm help on Linux I don't see a huge amount of
>> difference between competent reading applications.
>>
>
> CHM has a competent search and index feature.
>

Isn't that more up to application than the documentation format?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20180218/f943a927/attachment.html>