Anybody still using the chm docs

[Manu]

On 17 February 2018 at 18:32, Danni Coy <danni.coy at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 17 February 2018 at 16:52, Danni Coy <danni.coy at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Is the reason for favouring chm as a format that it fits in with the
>>> visual studio ecosystem better?
>>> Having used both pdf and chm help on Linux I don't see a huge amount of
>>> difference between competent reading applications.
>>>
>>
>> CHM has a competent search and index feature.
>>
>
> Isn't that more up to application than the documentation format?
>

The index is part of the CHM format.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20180217/1b80cc9e/attachment-0001.html>