Standard D, Mir D benchmarks against Numpy (BLAS)

Pavel Shkadzko p.shkadzko at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 15:46:47 UTC 2020


On Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 15:34:58 UTC, 9il wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 14:37:13 UTC, Pavel Shkadzko 
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> It depends on the problem they wanted me to solve.
>
>> [...]
>
> Agreed.  I just misunderstood the table at the forum, it was 
> misaligned for me. The numbers look cool, thank you for the 
> benchmark. Mir sorting looks slower then Phobos, it is 
> interesting, and need a fix. You can use Phobos sorting with 
> ndslice the same way with `each`.
>
> Minor updates
> https://github.com/tastyminerals/mir_benchmarks/pull/1

Thank you for the comments!

Looks like I will be updating the benchmarks tables today :)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list