Standard D, Mir D benchmarks against Numpy (BLAS)
Pavel Shkadzko
p.shkadzko at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 15:46:47 UTC 2020
On Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 15:34:58 UTC, 9il wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 14:37:13 UTC, Pavel Shkadzko
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> It depends on the problem they wanted me to solve.
>
>> [...]
>
> Agreed. I just misunderstood the table at the forum, it was
> misaligned for me. The numbers look cool, thank you for the
> benchmark. Mir sorting looks slower then Phobos, it is
> interesting, and need a fix. You can use Phobos sorting with
> ndslice the same way with `each`.
>
> Minor updates
> https://github.com/tastyminerals/mir_benchmarks/pull/1
Thank you for the comments!
Looks like I will be updating the benchmarks tables today :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list