Standard D, Mir D benchmarks against Numpy (BLAS)

[9il]

On Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 15:46:47 UTC, Pavel Shkadzko wrote:
> On Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 15:34:58 UTC, 9il wrote:
>> On Thursday, 12 March 2020 at 14:37:13 UTC, Pavel Shkadzko 
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> It depends on the problem they wanted me to solve.
>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Agreed.  I just misunderstood the table at the forum, it was 
>> misaligned for me. The numbers look cool, thank you for the 
>> benchmark. Mir sorting looks slower then Phobos, it is 
>> interesting, and need a fix. You can use Phobos sorting with 
>> ndslice the same way with `each`.

Phobos sort bench bug report:
https://github.com/tastyminerals/mir_benchmarks/issues/2

>> Minor updates
>> https://github.com/tastyminerals/mir_benchmarks/pull/1
>
> Thank you for the comments!
>
> Looks like I will be updating the benchmarks tables today :)

another small update that changes the ration a lot
https://github.com/tastyminerals/mir_benchmarks/pull/3