Feedback Thread: DIP 1033--Implicit Conversion of Expressions to Delegates--Final Review

[Manu]

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:35 PM Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> [...]
>

I'd just like to make sure a reference to my concern about hidden implicit
allocations that I made in the comments thread is present here.

I would strongly appeal to amend the DIP to only apply to `scope`
delegates, such that they may (should? must?) stack allocate. Non-scope
delegates require typical `() =>` syntax, which is important because it is
possible to SEE the allocation.
Potential for invisible closure allocations at every argument to every
function call in D is terrifying to me.

Otherwise, I like this DIP.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20201123/7d5e8b46/attachment.htm>