Tuple DIP

[Rekel]

Is this DIP dead?
Several parts of the proposal seem very nice to me, and it seems 
like a waste not to have it considered. (assuming 
https://github.com/tgehr/DIPs/blob/tuple-syntax/DIPs/DIP1xxx-tg.md is the latest version of this not submitted proposal)

Slightly unrelated, but wouldn't it be better to change the comma 
operator to a different symbol entirely? I can see why it has 
some merit, if not for the poor symbol choice.
(interestingly there's already a DIP that may be related to 
making new symbols possible 
https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1007.md, though i may be mistaken in interpreting it as such)