Tuple DIP

[aberba]

On Friday, 1 January 2021 at 18:53:39 UTC, Rekel wrote:
> Is this DIP dead?
> Several parts of the proposal seem very nice to me, and it 
> seems like a waste not to have it considered. (assuming 
> https://github.com/tgehr/DIPs/blob/tuple-syntax/DIPs/DIP1xxx-tg.md is the latest version of this not submitted proposal)
>
> Slightly unrelated, but wouldn't it be better to change the 
> comma operator to a different symbol entirely?
And what would you like it to be?

  I can see why it
> has some merit, if not for the poor symbol choice.
All my experience with such a feature used comma for ignored 
values.

> (interestingly there's already a DIP that may be related to 
> making new symbols possible 
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/accepted/DIP1007.md, though i may be mistaken in interpreting it as such)