What is the reasoning behind the lack of conversions when passing parameters

[Carl Sturtivant]

On Tuesday, 6 February 2024 at 10:10:32 UTC, FeepingCreature 
wrote:
> I just don't think that "this feature can be abused" is a 
> convincing argument. So what? Make it opt-in, mark it as 
> dangerous, then when people use it it's on them.
>
> I don't want implicit conversion to always be enabled, I want 
> it to be enabled by a keyword or UDA. @implicit or something. 
> Even per-parameter would be useful!

+1

@implicit

Exactly what's needed under the present circumstances. Naive 
scripting with Variant could then work out of the box, for 
example, instead of being completely blocked.