What is the reasoning behind the lack of conversions when passing parameters
Carl Sturtivant
sturtivant at gmail.com
Fri Feb 9 23:59:18 UTC 2024
On Tuesday, 6 February 2024 at 10:10:32 UTC, FeepingCreature
wrote:
> I just don't think that "this feature can be abused" is a
> convincing argument. So what? Make it opt-in, mark it as
> dangerous, then when people use it it's on them.
>
> I don't want implicit conversion to always be enabled, I want
> it to be enabled by a keyword or UDA. @implicit or something.
At one point something related was viewed with approval. Probably
got nixed behind the scenes. Disappointing inflexibility indeed.
https://forum.dlang.org/post/lddjmh$8rn$1@digitalmars.com
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list