Why isn’t 2.110 published?

[Steven Schveighoffer]

On Sunday, 17 November 2024 at 19:57:34 UTC, Lance Bachmeier 
wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 November 2024 at 09:47:23 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
>> That is a bit extreme IMO.
>
> It would be for personal projects where it's just me and nobody 
> else. I can't tell others to invest a bunch of (very scarce) 
> time in a language unless they'll be able to use it in the 
> future. Moreover, we sometimes have to return to the code in 
> five years, and the profession is moving to a requirement to 
> share our code publicly, so the time horizon is very long.

I think it's disingenuous to treat a lack of release as a lack of 
progress. As it so happens in this case, it's the fact we rely 
currently on one person to do the release, and it's a very 
non-automated process. That is going to be remedied.

>> Things like this happen all the time in volunteer only 
>> projects.
>
> That's what has me worried. The volunteer hours dry up, 
> releases slip, and then a year or two later the project is on 
> life support.

It's very obviously not on life support, just look at the commit 
activity here: https://github.com/dlang

While you are free to draw your own conclusions however you want, 
I think either you are not looking at the right metrics, or you 
have some other reason to be leaving D.

-Steve