Why isn’t 2.110 published?

[Lance Bachmeier]

On Sunday, 17 November 2024 at 22:24:03 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:

> I think it's disingenuous to treat a lack of release as a lack 
> of progress. As it so happens in this case, it's the fact we 
> rely currently on one person to do the release, and it's a very 
> non-automated process. That is going to be remedied.

That's not what I'm doing. The exact phrase was "it's reached the 
point that the lack of manpower allows something like this to 
happen". We recently had discussions about Visual D and GtkD 
being dead. These are major projects and nobody's picked them up. 
Contributors have left and nobody's taken their place. Adam left 
to work on his fork. The list of problems could go on but I don't 
have time for that discussion. And now a release is nearly four 
months late.

> I think either you are not looking at the right metrics,

I can't imagine anyone comparing the current situation to where 
things were six or eight years ago and not be deeply concerned.

> or you have some other reason to be leaving D.

I'm not leaving D. I've moved projects to other languages if 
others are involved. I cannot look at the current state of 
affairs and tell someone else they should use D.