Move Constructor Syntax

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 06/10/2024 6:38 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 10/5/2024 9:33 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> 
>     Honestly, I'd just argue for slapping @move on the constructor,
> 
> Then people would want to slap @move on other things.

Does that not have desirable potential additions, once move constructors 
have been resolved?

For now, it can error if seen elsewhere.