Move Constructor Syntax

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sun Oct 6 16:56:37 UTC 2024


On 10/6/2024 2:58 AM, Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole wrote:
> Does that not have desirable potential additions, once move constructors have 
> been resolved?
> For now, it can error if seen elsewhere.

I know you've proposed @move for parameters already, but this seems inconsistent 
with that.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list