Move Constructor Syntax
    Kagamin 
    spam at here.lot
       
    Sat Oct 12 15:19:08 UTC 2024
    
    
  
On Saturday, 12 October 2024 at 08:06:16 UTC, Manu wrote:
> 4. rvalue constructors exist and are used, and are NOT move 
> constructors
>
>
> They are rvalue constructors; it doesn't matter what they do, 
> their selection criteria remains identical.
>
> I could similarly write your a copy constructors that doesn't 
> make a copy... that's my prerogative.
You mean rvalue constructors that duplicate their argument are 
just incorrectly implemented move constructors?
    
    
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list