Move Constructor Syntax

[Manu]

On Sun, 13 Oct 2024, 01:21 Kagamin via Digitalmars-d, <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Saturday, 12 October 2024 at 08:06:16 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > 4. rvalue constructors exist and are used, and are NOT move
> > constructors
> >
> >
> > They are rvalue constructors; it doesn't matter what they do,
> > their selection criteria remains identical.
> >
> > I could similarly write your a copy constructors that doesn't
> > make a copy... that's my prerogative.
>
> You mean rvalue constructors that duplicate their argument are
> just incorrectly implemented move constructors?
>

No, that's not what I mean. It's just "a constructor", and you're the
master of your code. Write it to do whatever it needs to do!

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20241013/6e40de53/attachment.htm>