What _is_ up with v2.110?

[monkyyy]

On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 03:38:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 01:45:32 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
>
>>
>> If a project repeatedly fails to achieve the goals it sets for 
>> itself, that does not generally bode well for the project's 
>> future.
>
> This is a consequence of having a complex release process 
> that's dependent on one person, and not a reflection on 
> anything beyond that. In hindsight, it's surprising that it 
> hasn't happened before now.
>
> The upside is that it's highlighted the necessity to simplify 
> and de-bottleneck the release process so that when the primary 
> is unavailable, someone else can handle it.

I bet adr could make a binary whenever you want. V2.110++ would 
be a fantastic release