What _is_ up with v2.110?

[Richard (Rikki) Andrew Cattermole]

On 05/03/2025 6:18 PM, monkyyy wrote:
> On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 03:38:27 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 5 March 2025 at 01:45:32 UTC, Paul Backus wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If a project repeatedly fails to achieve the goals it sets for 
>>> itself, that does not generally bode well for the project's future.
>>
>> This is a consequence of having a complex release process that's 
>> dependent on one person, and not a reflection on anything beyond that. 
>> In hindsight, it's surprising that it hasn't happened before now.
>>
>> The upside is that it's highlighted the necessity to simplify and de- 
>> bottleneck the release process so that when the primary is 
>> unavailable, someone else can handle it.
> 
> I bet adr could make a binary whenever you want. V2.110++ would be a 
> fantastic release

The nightlies are almost identical to the release binaries, they are in 
no way shape or form what is limiting it.

There is a lot more to the release _process_ than just making a binary.

I.e. change log handling, which is held up by the migration to GitHub 
issues.