BindBC codegen survey

[Ogion]

I’m the developer of BindBC-Allegro5.

On Monday, 25 August 2025 at 10:40:18 UTC, IchorDev wrote:
> `bindbc-allegro5` doesn't wrap its function pointers in a 
> regular function (most official BindBC libraries do this now)

I considered using wrappers but was concerned about possible 
performance impact on debug builds. The overhead of uninlined 
wrappers in hot parts of code is not negligible.

> For most use-cases static bindings are simpler.

Static bindings have a compile-time dependency on the 
dynamic/import libraries. I’d say that dynamic bindings are 
simpler for a casual user.