BindBC codegen survey

Jordan Wilson wilsonjord at gmail.com
Thu Sep 4 23:12:35 UTC 2025


On Tuesday, 2 September 2025 at 10:41:30 UTC, Ogion wrote:
>> For most use-cases static bindings are simpler.
>
> Static bindings have a compile-time dependency on the 
> dynamic/import libraries. I’d say that dynamic bindings are 
> simpler for a casual user.

Yeah, not having to use `gendef/dlltool` to generate import lib 
is nice.

Jordan


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list