BindBC codegen survey

IchorDev zxinsworld at gmail.com
Fri Sep 5 15:48:04 UTC 2025


On Tuesday, 2 September 2025 at 10:41:30 UTC, Ogion wrote:
>> For most use-cases static bindings are simpler.
>
> Static bindings have a compile-time dependency on the 
> dynamic/import libraries. I’d say that dynamic bindings are 
> simpler for a casual user.

The compile-time linker errors are usually easier to understand, 
if you ask me. They also don't require the user to write any code 
to find out what's going wrong.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list