Extending D's support for object-oriented design with private(this)

NotYouAgain NotYouAgain at gmail.com
Sun Apr 28 00:16:37 UTC 2024


On Saturday, 27 April 2024 at 13:10:08 UTC, Dukc wrote:
> .. ..
> You need to accept that it's better to agree to disagree, or 
> you won't be taken seriously in a delicate subject like this.

A programmer being able to declare a private member in a class is 
a 'delicate' subject.

It inflames war? Really?

Yes I know this is all true actually.

But the idea is fundamentally sound.

I simply cannot agree to those that say it is not sound.

The motivations for such fierce opposition to it, is the problem.

By discussing it, their motivations become clearer.

My motiviation could not be simpler. I just want to declare a 
private member in my class - that is all I want.


More information about the dip.ideas mailing list