Extending D's support for object-oriented design with private(this)
NotYouAgain
NotYouAgain at gmail.com
Sun Apr 28 01:16:36 UTC 2024
On Saturday, 27 April 2024 at 23:47:59 UTC, Warin Kempf wrote:
> On Saturday, 27 April 2024 at 13:10:08 UTC, Dukc wrote:
>> On Thursday, 25 April 2024 at 05:37:24 UTC, NotYouAgain wrote:
>
>> I need to stress though, that you need to approach this
>> subject with utmost diplomacy and humblety. Class-level
>> `private` has been the very subject of more than one flame war
>> in these forums. You will quickly become shunned if you're
>> seen as instigating another one. The disclaimers you included
>> at beginning of your post hint that you're already aware of
>> that.
>
> Yes because he instigated the last few wars.
>
> Its the only reason I hope Walter rejects this idea, seeing
> this guy lose his mind every 12 months is oddly amusing.
Actually, if you look at this post from Walter (on a seperate
idea), well, I'm fundamentlly using the same logic as he is.
https://forum.dlang.org/post/v0h23q$1b89$1@digitalmars.com
That is, you can still programmer well with out private(this),
sure, but ..and then I'd use all most the exact logic in his
arguements....
More information about the dip.ideas
mailing list