[dmd-beta] One issue left for 2.064
Walter Bright
walter at digitalmars.com
Fri Nov 8 11:37:36 PST 2013
On 11/7/2013 5:30 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 09:43 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> On 11/05/2013 02:18 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>
>>> All I did was run the installer scripts (on github) to build the rpm
>>> packages. Are those scripts wrong?
>> No, the scripts are OK, but the libphobo2.so build on Debian (or Ubuntu)
>> doesn't work on Fedora or openSuse.
>> As we couldn't agree to workaround this issue I proposed to build working rpm
>> packages.
>>
> I rebuild and tested the rpms with a replaced libphobos2.so.
>
> 86fc8d8ac5d807c83c9235b86fdb2b10
> http://dlang.dawg.eu/download/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
> 999752c341577e6b59410422df707165
> http://dlang.dawg.eu/download/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
> d7421b9c66e9ccf74c41b676f1f6899f
> http://dlang.dawg.eu/download/dmd-2.064.2-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
> b39e10c939fd005c89f849b2263a19e0
> http://dlang.dawg.eu/download/dmd-2.064.2-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
>
>
call them .3 ? And what exactly is different about them? Should I cherry-pick a
pull first?
More information about the dmd-beta
mailing list