[dmd-beta] beta branch name
Brad Anderson
eco at gnuk.net
Thu Jan 23 21:42:26 PST 2014
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> The problem is that as specified, _every_ fix requires also setting up
> builds in the auto-tester (regardless of who does it). That should be once
> per maintained version. Deleting and recreating is a waste of everyone's
> time.
>
OK, makes sense in the context of the autotester since it requires
specifying the branches to test in `server/add/github-post.ghtml` (if I'm
understanding how it works properly). I was thinking it might be as easy as
just having the autotester test every branch on D-P-L (or just release and
hotfix only if they are present). It doesn't look like how it works is very
adaptable to that type of setup though.
> It's not just me that's affected. Anyone who wants to test releases as
> they're being built has to carefully track what branch to use when, which
> is tedious and a waste of time.
>
>
They checkout `release` if there is an upcoming release, otherwise a tag.
I don't see any difference here other than typing `git checkout release`
instead of `git checkout 2.065`.
> Also, what if we decide to patch two past releases, does that happen
> serially, using the release branch name for each of the versions one at a
> time? Also stupid and a waste of time.
>
>
It seems incredibly unlikely this would ever happen. Like I said though,
we can call the branches whatever and not delete them if that makes it
easier for you. This aspect isn't important to how it all works.
Should I continue or is it obvious now?
I don't understand why you are always so hostile in your correspondences.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20140123/36c545f6/attachment.html>
More information about the dmd-beta
mailing list