[ENet-discuss] Unreliable Delivery for Large Messages

Lee Salzman lsalzman at gmail.com
Fri May 27 20:06:50 PDT 2011


For a suitable paypal donation I might be encouraged to add an unreliable
fragment option. ;)

On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Alexander Dolgansky <alexd221 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Yes that's one of the options that I currently looking at.
>
> The reason why I need it in my project is because I have a large
> number of data points that need to be sent out as one message at a
> certain rate.
> Therefore, each message needs to be sent out only once to keep up with
> the overall sending rate. If message pieces arrive out of order or it
> is not possible to send out
> all of the pieces due to network issues, the whole message must be
> dropped. This is the required behavior for some of the messages that I
> need to transfer between nodes.
>
> Although splitting the data into smaller chucks is a valid solution to
> my problem, I am wondering if ENet can do it for me.
> After all, ENet already fragments any message that is larger than MTU,
> so it is just a matter of figuring out how I can force ENet to
> send fragments unreliably.
>
> Is it possible to accomplish what I am trying to do with ENet with
> only minor changes to the source code?
>
> If yes, I would love to get pointers on how I should modify the source
> code.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alexander.
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20110527/339f7777/attachment.html>


More information about the ENet-discuss mailing list