[ENet-discuss] ENet 1.3.2 and 1.2.4 released!

[Ruud van Gaal]

It sounds important, but I'm not sure what you mean with 'regression in
packet queing'. Is it important in every-day use, or is it an uncommon
scenario?

Ruud

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Philip Bennefall <philip at blastbay.com>wrote:

> Thanks Lee, have downloaded this and will upgrade my engine. Aappreciate
> all the work you put into this library!
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Philip Bennefall
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee Salzman" <lsalzman at gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion of the ENet library" <enet-discuss at cubik.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:26 AM
> Subject: [ENet-discuss] ENet 1.3.2 and 1.2.4 released!
>
>
> While I was investigating how to do unreliable fragmenting, I came across a
> super silly regression in unreliable packet queuing. So this release is sort
> of a twofer, you get unreliable fragmenting option via
> ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNRELIABLE_FRAGMENT and the bug fix (so upgrading is
> recommended). No protocol breakage was done, so it is compatible.
>
> ENet 1.3.2 download link:
> http://enet.bespin.org/download/enet-1.3.2.tar.gz
> ENet 1.2.4 download link:
> http://enet.bespin.org/download/enet-1.2.4.tar.gz
>
> ChangeLog:
>
> ENet 1.3.2 (May 31, 2011):
>
> * added support for unreliable packet fragmenting via the packet flag
> ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNRELIABLE_FRAGMENT
> * fixed regression in unreliable packet queuing
> * added check against received port to limit some forms of IP-spoofing
>
> ENet 1.2.4 (May 31, 2011):
>
> * fixed regression in unreliable packet queuing
> * added check against received port to limit some forms of IP-spoofing
>
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> ENet-discuss mailing list
> ENet-discuss at cubik.org
> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20110531/de051f10/attachment.html>